Jill Derby...in the Interest of the Fairness Doctrine

I'll keep this one short.

I don't like her. Not one iota. In fact, my dislike for her quite possibly transcends my dislike for Obama. She's another greasy change band-waggoner and, frankly, I find her "aw shucks" presentation of herself to be patronizing.

Despite the aggressive campaigning from both sides, Dean Heller has been a fine representative for the Second Nevada Congressional District. Indeed, I would be fairly upset to lose his representation.

T'other day I noticed that the DNC felt compelled to advertise for Ms. Derby, I reckon with a feeling that this district was, possibly, winnable for the first time in its nearly thirty year history. The DNC ad does two things which really get under my craw more than just about anything else: one, it quotes only the Las Vegas Sun, and two, it refers to those quotes as being from a "local paper." Um, different city, 450 miles away, completely different district(s). Talk about patronizing, the best that can be argued is the opinion of an editorial staff in the "second" paper of a city eight hours away from 'almost' everybody which exists in a separate, distant congressional district? She is culpable for this nonsense, at least by proxy, and if this is the best that she is able to muster ('I'm not a Republican and it's time for a change and those people waaaaay down there agree') then she obviously does not take Northern Nevada seriously enough to warrant her election.


So let me say this now: if you, Jill Derby, win our representation, I will make it my mission to blog you out! It will become a personal vendetta, and I will relish each and every savory, dillish second.

In the interest of the possible reinstatement of the "Fairness Doctrine," I offer a Democratic response to the above post:

"I disagree."

Fair enough.